1 |
"Stephen Bennett" <spbennett@×××××.com> posted |
2 |
b38cd4360808041129i967e24eud0b2fa9f4e544dee@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
3 |
below, on Mon, 04 Aug 2008 18:29:14 +0000: |
4 |
|
5 |
> I would like to put forward the following suggestion for the Council's |
6 |
> consideration: |
7 |
> |
8 |
> "While the current state of PMS is not perfect, it is a reasonably close |
9 |
> approximation to existing and historical behaviour of EAPI 0. Given |
10 |
> this, and that getting a perfect definition is not feasible on a |
11 |
> timescale shorter than several years, it should be treated as a draft |
12 |
> standard, and any deviations from it found in the gentoo tree or package |
13 |
> managers should have a bug filed against either the deviator or PMS to |
14 |
> resolve the differences. |
15 |
|
16 |
Has any tracking been done on the tree as it currently exists such that |
17 |
an estimate of the number of such bugs expected can be made? Surely, |
18 |
while thinking about making a commitment to the statement above, the |
19 |
number of bugs it's going to trigger is apropos. |
20 |
|
21 |
> "On the differences between EAPI 0 and EAPI 1, a much smaller topic, it |
22 |
> is complete and can stand as a full specification" |
23 |
> |
24 |
> Alternatively, what (specific) changes are required to PMS before such a |
25 |
> statement can be made? |
26 |
|
27 |
As an alternate, if there's not such a list, perhaps the proposal should |
28 |
suggest creating one, possibly by going ahead and filing those bugs, with |
29 |
an appropriate keyword and/or special assignee for the time being, such |
30 |
that we at least have an idea of the size of the job ahead, without them |
31 |
counting against package maintainers, etc, bug-count at this time. (They |
32 |
could still be CCed and/or initial assignee, but if the latter, they'd be |
33 |
free to reassign to the special assignee for the moment, if so desired.) |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
37 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
38 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |