| 1 |
On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 14:15, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> If no one intends to join, we should drop the following to maintainer- |
| 3 |
> needed: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I use some of those packets daily. Is there a way to join the Common |
| 6 |
Lisp project without currently having maintainer status or is that not |
| 7 |
intended? |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Especially dev-lisp/sbcl is important to me. I use the majority of the |
| 10 |
mentioned software, but the distribution of the libraries usually |
| 11 |
happens through different channels, so I did not install those via |
| 12 |
portage. When taking those over I'd have to look into how they are |
| 13 |
packaged. Maintaining the Common Lisp implementations on the other |
| 14 |
hand should not be a major problem. I regularly build SBCL and CLISP |
| 15 |
from source on systems which don't provide it in another way or don't |
| 16 |
support current system calls which the binary version expects. I also |
| 17 |
have experience writing ebuilds. |
Archives