| 1 |
On 03/07/15 08:20 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi everyone, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> This one is mostly for the bug wranglers. There is a new email list and |
| 5 |
> alias for the musl (sub?)project [1]. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> List: gentoo-musl@l.g.o |
| 8 |
> alias: musl@g.o |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> musl is a new C standard lib [2]. It adheres scrictly to POSIX, XOPEN, |
| 11 |
> SUSv3 standards. As a result, a number of packages break with musl. |
| 12 |
> Usually these are small bugs, like missing headers mandated by POSIX, |
| 13 |
> but still even a small error breaks a package. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> I don't want to burdon the maintainers with these bugs, so I'd like to |
| 16 |
> ask bug wranglers that if they see a bug due to musl, to please assign |
| 17 |
> it to me and cc the maintainer. I'll fix the bugs on the musl overlay |
| 18 |
> [3] and upstream the patches, while keeping the maintainers informed |
| 19 |
> about what's going on. Don't worry, I won't touch any packages. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Bug wrangling usually proceeds via the metadata.xml, but there really is |
| 22 |
> no structure there for communicating the above situation. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Refs. |
| 26 |
> [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl |
| 27 |
> [2] http://www.musl-libc.org/ |
| 28 |
> [3] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/musl.git |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
why not make a "musl" component in bugzilla? |
Archives