1 |
Hi Daniel, |
2 |
|
3 |
On 3/20/06, Daniel Drake <dsd@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> One of the bigger problems is that we have a huge user community who are |
5 |
> keen on contributing, but we have such a high barrier for entry to the |
6 |
> developer community. Quite rightly so - we're dealing with a live tree, |
7 |
> so we can't give out commit access on the street. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> At the same time, I feel that we're missing out. Comparing Gentoo with |
10 |
> some other large open-source communities that I am personally involved |
11 |
> in, I feel that we're too closed. |
12 |
|
13 |
The two big problems are that non-devs don't know where to go to get |
14 |
involved, and if they want to do more than just chat, there isn't |
15 |
anywhere for them to go. |
16 |
|
17 |
I've been very happy with using svn+trac overlays to bridge this gap. |
18 |
They provide a sandbox for contributions to be shared and evaluated. |
19 |
They provide a place where I've been able to give commit access to |
20 |
non-devs, so that they can learn the ropes w/out threatening the |
21 |
Portage tree proper. They provide a place where people who just want |
22 |
to write docs for a single package can contribute. |
23 |
|
24 |
Overlays create a sense of participation that's lacking with Bugzilla |
25 |
patch submissions. Backed up with regular communication (I recommend |
26 |
not recruiting anyone who won't spend time in the IRC channels, but |
27 |
that's a personal preference), they help us get things done quicker. |
28 |
|
29 |
The downside with overlays at the moment is that they're scattered |
30 |
around the net, and if you don't know where to look they can be very |
31 |
hard to find. I've been talking with infra about providing |
32 |
overlays.g.o as a central hosting service for herd and individual |
33 |
developer overlays. Infra have been very supportive of the idea. I |
34 |
just need to free up some time to get the service launched. |
35 |
|
36 |
Best regards, |
37 |
Stu |
38 |
|
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |