| 1 |
On Wed, 17 May 2006 17:00:10 -0400 Chris Gianelloni |
| 2 |
<wolf31o2@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
| Paludis does not conform to the Release Engineering guidelines. It is |
| 4 |
| *incapable* of producing a Gentoo release. The authors have expressed |
| 5 |
| their intentions to *never* perform any actions necessary to work |
| 6 |
| towards making Paludis capable of producing a Gentoo release. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
And what has producing a releng-style Gentoo release got to do with |
| 9 |
using Paludis as a package manager? That's like saying ZSH shouldn't be |
| 10 |
included in the tree until it can be used in place of bash. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
| This is completely unacceptable to Release Engineering, and as such, |
| 13 |
| it is my recommendation that no support be added to the *portage* |
| 14 |
| tree to support paludis. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You mean the *gentoo-x86* tree, right? The only reason some people call |
| 17 |
it the 'Portage' tree is that there's not previously been a need to |
| 18 |
call it something else. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 22 |
Mail : ciaran dot mccreesh at blueyonder.co.uk |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives