| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Anant Narayanan <anant@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Some of you may argue that we already have proxy-maintainers. That's a |
| 3 |
> great idea, all I'm asking for is for us to formalize the position. |
| 4 |
> Giving a proxy-maintainer an official acknowledgement will definitely |
| 5 |
> attract more users to contribute. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
IMO the problem with proxy-maintainers is that most users don't know |
| 8 |
such a thing exists. I bet some users could proxy-maintain a lot of |
| 9 |
orphaned packages if we potentiate proxy-maint. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-- |
| 12 |
Santiago M. Mola |
| 13 |
Jabber ID: cooldwind@×××××.com |
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives