| 1 |
On 21:07 Wed 05 Mar , Santiago M. Mola wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Anant Narayanan <anant@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Some of you may argue that we already have proxy-maintainers. That's a |
| 4 |
> > great idea, all I'm asking for is for us to formalize the position. |
| 5 |
> > Giving a proxy-maintainer an official acknowledgement will definitely |
| 6 |
> > attract more users to contribute. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> IMO the problem with proxy-maintainers is that most users don't know |
| 9 |
> such a thing exists. I bet some users could proxy-maintain a lot of |
| 10 |
> orphaned packages if we potentiate proxy-maint. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
++ |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
IMO giving proxy-maintainer due credit and publicity, meaning make it a formal |
| 15 |
position, could solve the very problem Anant's proposal intended to solve. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Zhang Le |
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives