| 1 |
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 14 August 2013 16:43, Keith Dart <keith@×××××××××.biz> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Re , William Hubbs said: |
| 4 |
>>> All, |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> This message is an announcement and a reminder. |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few |
| 9 |
>>> days. |
| 10 |
>>> |
| 11 |
>>> If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies: |
| 12 |
>>> remember that you might be subject to breakage. |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
>> I just got around to upgrading to it. When I did my /etc/conf.d/net |
| 15 |
>> file disappeared, and my network interface would not come up. There is |
| 16 |
>> not even a sample net file any more. I had to manually add it back, |
| 17 |
>> using a syntax I found on the wiki site. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> The package is now masked (openrc-0.12) because quite a few people |
| 22 |
> lost their net configs |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
I wonder if this has to do with bug #462674 which was about to |
| 25 |
generate a disaster on one of my old servers as well. Thankfully, the |
| 26 |
net config was stored in a local git repo and I just had to reset the |
| 27 |
its state to HEAD. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Now I need to go sacrifice a cow to Linus to demonstrate my gratitude. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> So yep, ~arch being *this* broken is not so nice |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> -- |
| 35 |
> Regards, |
| 36 |
> Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 37 |
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
Fabio Erculiani |
Archives