Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
To: John Davis <zhen@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II.
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:28:38
Message-Id: 20030715182836.GE14630@cerberus.oppresses.us
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II. by John Davis
1 On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 02:17:23PM -0400, John Davis wrote:
2 > > Additionally, the existing structure has only been in place for
3 > > something like three weeks - maybe we should wait and see what kinds of
4 > > improvements come from that before doing anything extreme.
5 >
6 > Actually, now would be the best time to do anything extreme, simply because the new management is so young, therefore generally more receptive to change.
7 >
8
9 But you haven't seen whether it works or not. Why do you want to
10 immediately change something that's brand new?
11
12 I'm not opposed to some of the suggestions in your email, I'm just
13 wondering why you feel they're necessary without allowing the new
14 management structure to function for a while and observe how well it
15 works.
16
17 --
18 Jon Portnoy
19 avenj/irc.freenode.net
20
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II. Todd Berman <tberman@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo part II. John Davis <zhen@g.o>