1 |
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:32:40AM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
2 |
> OK. If that's not possible, I'll push for the "banned from gentoo |
3 |
> development" status as it obviously makes sense, will help Gentoo, and |
4 |
> will not impact PMS. If Ciaran is sticking around on this list using |
5 |
> PMS as a pretext to insult various people and projects, then this is |
6 |
> more than acceptable grounds to be banned from gentoo development IMO |
7 |
> and thus allow my suggestion to be put into action. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Really, I don't see any reason for any party to fight my suggestion, |
10 |
> as it would benefit everyone. If people are truly concerned about |
11 |
> productivity, then I would expect them to support it. |
12 |
> |
13 |
Banning Ciaran *is* going to hurt PMS as he's been asking many questions |
14 |
related to PMS lately on -dev ML and the discussions have generally been |
15 |
very good imo. |
16 |
|
17 |
Regards, |
18 |
Bryan Østergaard |
19 |
-- |
20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |