| 1 |
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 10:32:40AM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 2 |
> OK. If that's not possible, I'll push for the "banned from gentoo |
| 3 |
> development" status as it obviously makes sense, will help Gentoo, and |
| 4 |
> will not impact PMS. If Ciaran is sticking around on this list using |
| 5 |
> PMS as a pretext to insult various people and projects, then this is |
| 6 |
> more than acceptable grounds to be banned from gentoo development IMO |
| 7 |
> and thus allow my suggestion to be put into action. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Really, I don't see any reason for any party to fight my suggestion, |
| 10 |
> as it would benefit everyone. If people are truly concerned about |
| 11 |
> productivity, then I would expect them to support it. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
Banning Ciaran *is* going to hurt PMS as he's been asking many questions |
| 14 |
related to PMS lately on -dev ML and the discussions have generally been |
| 15 |
very good imo. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Regards, |
| 18 |
Bryan Østergaard |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives