| 1 |
OK. If that's not possible, I'll push for the "banned from gentoo |
| 2 |
development" status as it obviously makes sense, will help Gentoo, and |
| 3 |
will not impact PMS. If Ciaran is sticking around on this list using |
| 4 |
PMS as a pretext to insult various people and projects, then this is |
| 5 |
more than acceptable grounds to be banned from gentoo development IMO |
| 6 |
and thus allow my suggestion to be put into action. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Really, I don't see any reason for any party to fight my suggestion, |
| 9 |
as it would benefit everyone. If people are truly concerned about |
| 10 |
productivity, then I would expect them to support it. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
-Daniel |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
On 3/4/07, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 15 |
> Daniel Robbins wrote: |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Rationale: You (Ciaran) have already been explicitly banned from |
| 18 |
> > Gentoo development yet are acting as the project's official spokesman |
| 19 |
> > on this list which is clearly a Gentoo development list. I am asking |
| 20 |
> > that you have a basic respect for your removal from Gentoo, despite |
| 21 |
> > your personal feelings, which to me means that you are not "involved" |
| 22 |
> > as a developer on a day-to-day basis and not working directly with |
| 23 |
> > other Gentoo developers - except those that might want or need to work |
| 24 |
> > with you on non-Gentoo projects (who can then freely interact with you |
| 25 |
> > on non-Gentoo lists.) |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> There is a difference between being banned from Gentoo development and |
| 29 |
> losing developer status. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Regards, |
| 32 |
> Petteri |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives