| 1 |
unstable != broken |
| 2 |
as for going from unstable to stable, the developers test it, |
| 3 |
we gather input from end users, etc... |
| 4 |
-mike |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
On Tuesday 22 October 2002 05:06 pm, Dave Nellans wrote: |
| 7 |
> i understand how the process is actually implement, my question was more |
| 8 |
> towards the process... do we have any formal/informal guidelines about |
| 9 |
> when a package is ready to be moved from package.mask to unstable to |
| 10 |
> stable? based on labeling a subset of the tree as "unstable" it seems |
| 11 |
> redundant to have package.mask as well. |
Archives