| 1 |
On Wed, 2005-06-15 at 10:34 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wednesday 15 June 2005 09:45 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:48 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:32 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it |
| 6 |
> > > > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, as |
| 7 |
> > > > building does not depend on portage being there. |
| 8 |
> > > |
| 9 |
> > > it was added when `portageq` didnt exist everywhere so we had to make |
| 10 |
> > > sure the portage on the system ran a new-enough version |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > we can drop it now if it'll break this circular DEPEND |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Please do. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> notice the 'if it breaks the circle' ;) |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> can someone confirm that ? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
I just created a new snapshot with this change made, so I'll let you |
| 21 |
know. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 25 |
Release Engineering - Strategic Lead/QA Manager |
| 26 |
Games - Developer |
| 27 |
Gentoo Linux |
Archives