| 1 |
On Wednesday 15 June 2005 09:45 am, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 17:48 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Tuesday 14 June 2005 05:32 pm, Paul de Vrieze wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > I don't think gcc-config should depend on portage at all. Or does it |
| 5 |
> > > actually use portage services. In any case it should be an RDEPEND, as |
| 6 |
> > > building does not depend on portage being there. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > it was added when `portageq` didnt exist everywhere so we had to make |
| 9 |
> > sure the portage on the system ran a new-enough version |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > we can drop it now if it'll break this circular DEPEND |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Please do. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
notice the 'if it breaks the circle' ;) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
can someone confirm that ? |
| 18 |
-mike |
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives