| 1 |
? Firefox compiles for me, i am unstable amd64. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
/ekg |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
On 3 May 2017 20:02, "Ian Stakenvicius" <axs@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> On 5/3/17 6:43 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>>> Hey all, |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into |
| 14 |
>>> packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order |
| 15 |
>>> to build [1]. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any |
| 19 |
>> software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped |
| 20 |
>> from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it. |
| 21 |
>> |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Just a heads-up, that p.mask list would happen to include firefox and |
| 24 |
> thunderbird right now. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
Archives