| 1 |
William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> It may take some work, but I do not think we could reach a point |
| 3 |
> where nothing could be changed. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Remember that, unlike cvs, every git clone, by default, has all of the |
| 6 |
> history of the repository, so all we would have to do is find another |
| 7 |
> place to host the repository and push it there. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I think that's too simplistic. Proprietary systems are a slippery |
| 10 |
slope. And the problem with GitHub Inc. in particular isn't their |
| 11 |
technology at all, but their processes and the mindset they promote, |
| 12 |
because the processes and mindset are locked to their platform. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
It sounds silly but it *is* a problem. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
//Peter |
Archives