| 1 |
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 06:43 pm, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > QA team identifies a misbehaving dev who refuses to change and then hands |
| 4 |
> > off the name/relevant data to devrel ... QA team then is pretty much done |
| 5 |
> > with the issue and the rest is up to devrel to resolve |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I disagree that devrel should be involved. I think QA should hand off |
| 8 |
> directly to infra, who can deactivate accounts. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
so your previous off-topic comment about redtape in devrel processes was |
| 11 |
irrelevant :P |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
at any rate, you're proposing giving the control to the QA team which has no |
| 14 |
guidelines or processes outlined, let alone the manpower. devrel has all of |
| 15 |
these. |
| 16 |
-mike |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives