| 1 |
On Sunday 06 May 2007 3:31:32 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 6 May 2007 15:26:06 -0400 |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Sunday 06 May 2007 2:47:22 pm Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > On Sun, 6 May 2007 20:41:24 +0200 |
| 7 |
> > > |
| 8 |
> > > expose@×××××××××××.net wrote: |
| 9 |
> > > > Ciaran, if you where a bit more verbose you could save time. |
| 10 |
> > > |
| 11 |
> > > If people read the rest of the thread and the GLEP we'd all save a |
| 12 |
> > > lot more, and if people also tried out a reference implementation |
| 13 |
> > > then none of these threads would need more than about three posts... |
| 14 |
> > |
| 15 |
> > You say this, but every time someone quotes a relevant refuting part |
| 16 |
> > of the GLEP, you ignore it. |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Try this one: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Read the rest of the threads. I've already answered that several times. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
No, I've read the other threads. You've not explained how this is a critical |
| 23 |
update that requires a news item. You've said repeatedly in response to |
| 24 |
related questions that your experience with news for one package in one |
| 25 |
overlay used by a small subset of users that uses said package recieved good |
| 26 |
feedback, and that they would like to be informed of changes in the future. |
| 27 |
You were informed that elog can do just that, and you said repeatedly that |
| 28 |
elog is not sufficient because its not loggged by default. You could easily |
| 29 |
make elog logged by default in paludis, and that would achieve the same |
| 30 |
result as a news item. What did I forget? |
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives