1 |
On Sun, 6 May 2007 15:43:45 -0400 |
2 |
Dan Meltzer <hydrogen@×××××××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> No, I've read the other threads. You've not explained how this is a |
4 |
> critical update that requires a news item. You've said repeatedly in |
5 |
> response to related questions that your experience with news for one |
6 |
> package in one overlay used by a small subset of users that uses said |
7 |
> package recieved good feedback, and that they would like to be |
8 |
> informed of changes in the future. You were informed that elog can do |
9 |
> just that, and you said repeatedly that elog is not sufficient |
10 |
> because its not loggged by default. You could easily make elog |
11 |
> logged by default in paludis, and that would achieve the same result |
12 |
> as a news item. What did I forget? |
13 |
|
14 |
Er, making elog logged by default would not solve the "requires an |
15 |
explicit read" problem. Making elog require an explicit read would |
16 |
be far too annoying because most elog notices are noise. We've been |
17 |
over this already. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |