| 1 |
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:33:34 +0100 |
| 2 |
Marc Hildebrand <zypher@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Marius Mauch wrote: |
| 5 |
> [..] |
| 6 |
> > So much for background information, now to the actual question: |
| 7 |
> > Would you rather have now the ability to create multi-hash digests |
| 8 |
> > and Manifests with the result of a short and mid-term larger |
| 9 |
> > portage tree (in the long term the format will be phased out |
| 10 |
> > hopefully) or rather wait for Manifest2 support (which will |
| 11 |
> > definitely include multi hash support)? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I'd rather wait for Manifest2 support. |
| 14 |
> What is the ETA for the GLEP and the implementation after i? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
GLEP I still have to start writing (mostly a reformatting of a mail I |
| 17 |
sent a long time ago), there is already a prototype implementation |
| 18 |
(doesn't cover everything yet but works generally), target is |
| 19 |
for when current trunk will be released (still have to settle on a |
| 20 |
version for it), which should hopefully be after 2.0.54 gets out |
| 21 |
(which should be in the next few weeks). At a guess I'd say 4 months |
| 22 |
till stable (but really, that's just a guess, see the 2.1 fiasko). |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Marius |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be |
| 30 |
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. |
Archives