Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Simon Toth <happy.cerberus@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff)
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:22:07
Message-Id: 44E5E7CC.6090801@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff) by Chris White
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: RIPEMD160
3
4 * Chris White wrote, On 18.8.2006 17:32:
5 > On Friday 18 August 2006 08:12 am, Simon Toth wrote:
6 >> INTRO:
7 >> I have just a small proposal. There are many theme packages in portage,
8 >> but many good are still missing, the problem I actually noticed when
9 >> creating my own ebuild for comix cursors, is that there is really a mess
10 >> in theme packages. They are both in media-gfx and x11-themes, they are
11 >> named without any convention.
12 >
13 > Themes is kind of tricky. More on that in a bit.
14 >
15 >> PROPOSAL:
16 >> 1) create a new directory in portage root eye-candy [or similar]
17 >
18 > Naming needs help, but that's for later ;)
19 >
20 >> 2) move all theme packages in there
21 >
22 > I assume you mean everything in x11-themes?
23 I had the feeling that there were some programs, hallucinations are
24 coming, I better get a pause :)
25
26 >> 3) follow the naming convention: [application]-[type]-[name] (for gentoo
27 >> cursors this would be x11-cursors-gentoo, or for kdm theme tux mania it
28 >> would be kdm-theme-tuxmania)
29 >
30 > This worries me... I'm afraid this will promote users to start sending us
31 > themes for everything and the kitchen sink. This is a nightmare to an
32 > already interesting problem of tree maintainance.
33 Well, do you really think that moving some packages and changing their
34 names will cause people sending packages? :)
35
36 Instead it will improve the maintenance, look into x11-themes, there are
37 one word named packages! (example, what is comix? theme, program,
38 cursors package?)
39
40 >> 4) keep original packages as meta packages with notice, that users
41 >> should upgrade
42 >
43 > We add this to an update file which handles this for users transparently.
44
45 Even better :)
46
47 - --
48 Bc. Simon Toth
49 www.fi.muni.cz/~xtoth1
50 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
51 Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (MingW32)
52 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
53
54 iD8DBQFE5efMQDhHfsv/z6ARAwigAJ91Sv9BhY6Z1lXVOaB+olguu6mcawCgmc0d
55 5wM/3mSA0N2FJcFwJZLJrtM=
56 =enlL
57 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
58 --
59 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list