| 1 |
On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 07:24 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:20 -0600, R Hill wrote: |
| 3 |
> > Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > Good afternoon, |
| 5 |
> > > |
| 6 |
> > > probably in portage-2.0.54 a patch will be added to emit split debug |
| 7 |
> > > info. Having a split debug allows us to retain all the advantages of |
| 8 |
> > > stripping executables while gaining the ability to properly debug |
| 9 |
> > > executables in bfd aware programs. It's been in testing with a small |
| 10 |
> > > hand full of devs and works quite well, but before it's pushed in we |
| 11 |
> > > would like to get input from our devs & users. |
| 12 |
> > > |
| 13 |
> > > Would you be willing to give up space in $ROOT/usr/lib/debug for ELF |
| 14 |
> > > executables by default in order to aid in better debugging by or do we |
| 15 |
> > > want to only emit it when a FEATURE= is defined. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > How much space are we talking about? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> There is no fixed size here and depends on the number of packages you |
| 20 |
> have and the CFLAGS passed to the programs you build. |
| 21 |
> Naturally if you start building all your code with |
| 22 |
> CFLAGS="-g3 -ggdb" your going to end up with a larger debug info. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Of course I will be compiling with CFLAGS="-g3 -ggdb" :) |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
The reason I don't do it now is because debug info: |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
1) makes binaries larger |
| 29 |
2) makes binaries slower ( in my experience ( may have to do with 1) ) |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
And I don't ( not sure if anyone does ) care about any non-gdb debugger. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
So, can you give us a wild guess about the disk space ? How much does it |
| 34 |
take on your system and how many packages do you have installed ? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be |
| 37 |
present ? |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
Cheers, |
| 41 |
Ivan Yosifov. |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives