1 |
On 27/03/18 17:39, Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 12:12 PM, Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
3 |
>> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:34 AM, Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
5 |
>>>> It is about openness vs. isolation. |
6 |
>>> I'm pretty sure most developers, myself included, want to welcome |
7 |
>>> contributions. |
8 |
>> Closing of the mailing list does not sound like that. |
9 |
>> |
10 |
> Sure, but it is actually part of the motivation. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Consider this scenario. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Fred is a community member. Fred consistently harasses and trolls new |
15 |
> contributors in private. New contributors end up leaving because of |
16 |
> Fred. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Fred gets booted out as a result. No mention is made of why Fred as |
19 |
> booted out, because everything happened in private. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Now a bunch of community members get upset about Fred being booted out |
22 |
> without reason. Fred claims it is because he disagrees with the |
23 |
> leadership on something. People start arguing endlessly about |
24 |
> openness. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Ultimately the leaders just want Fred gone so that new contributors |
27 |
> aren't getting driven away. They can't explain that because then they |
28 |
> create potential civil liability for the project. The problem is that |
29 |
> the debate goes on for over a year despite intervening elections and |
30 |
> now this becomes the issue that is driving new contributors away. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> What solution would you propose for this problem? It isn't |
33 |
> hypothetical at all - I can think of one case in Gentoo's past where |
34 |
> this happened that I'm aware of, and I'd be shocked if it were the |
35 |
> only one. |
36 |
> |
37 |
>> And anyway, you can be sure that the problem will appear again, |
38 |
>> no matter how closed the list will be. |
39 |
> Sure, but we can at least force the negative advertising of Gentoo to |
40 |
> go elsewhere, rather than basically paying to run a negative PR |
41 |
> campaign against ourselves. |
42 |
> |
43 |
>>> A lot of this comes down to considering that most people in these |
44 |
>>> debates probably are well-intended. |
45 |
>> Taking away freedom is never justified by good intention. |
46 |
> You might want to choose a BSD-based distro then. :) |
47 |
> |
48 |
> And what about the freedom to endlessly troll and harass you and |
49 |
> others? Is this truly a freedom we want to stand for? How about the |
50 |
> freedom to harass members of legally-protected classes (something that |
51 |
> also has happened historically in the community)? |
52 |
> |
53 |
> Surely Gentoo's mission isn't to run completely unrestricated forums |
54 |
> for discussion of anything and everything. Our main purpose here is |
55 |
> to maintain a Linux distro, not provide a platform for anybody who has |
56 |
> an opinion on anything. Free expression has to be balanced against |
57 |
> the interests of people who want to actually contribute to the distro |
58 |
> without being endlessly trolled and harassed. |
59 |
> |
60 |
It sounds a lot to me like you're replacing one set of problems with |
61 |
another .. solving not a lot. Whether you take action on "Fred" or not, |
62 |
you're going to lose out, so what do you do... Where is the greater |
63 |
damage, with one/two people, 10/20 people or 100/200 people .. its a |
64 |
huge value judgement - certainly not one I'd like to make! |
65 |
|
66 |
You may or may not have heard the expression "throwing out the baby with |
67 |
the bathwater" .. alas I feel this measure is a good example of this. To |
68 |
try to rid the mailing list of one or two bad apples, you've cut the |
69 |
whole tree down so it can't bear fruit. I think this is a foolish step, |
70 |
but only time will tell that for sure ... The next "logical" step would |
71 |
simply be to delete the whole mailing list - I suppose that's the next |
72 |
"measure" when the trolling from white-listed members resurfaces.... And |
73 |
don't go telling me it doesn't exist .. set a bad example, others will |
74 |
surely follow ... |
75 |
|
76 |
Ooops, another $2 spent on a lost cause .. >,< |