| 1 |
On Thursday 26 May 2005 00:37, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> Marcus D. Hanwell posted <200505251748.27667.cryos@g.o>, excerpted |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> below, on Wed, 25 May 2005 17:48:20 +0100: |
| 5 |
> > I have just committed a fix to kde.eclass and kde-meta.eclass that |
| 6 |
> > disables visibility support in KDE 3.4 (thanks to FlameEyes for the |
| 7 |
> > patches). This was a new feature in KDE 3.4 which has caused at least one |
| 8 |
> > obvious bug, and possibly others that are less obvious[1]. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> [note the cross-posting] |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> That isn't going to kill it for gcc-4.0.1-snapshots, right, only gcc-3.4? |
| 13 |
> I'll be rather unhappy if the speed increases I've been attributing to |
| 14 |
> that visibility support under gcc4, disappear! =8^( |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
It seems that this has already been answered, but the KDE bug contains some |
| 17 |
more of the detail. It looks like KDE 3.5/4 is the target for getting proper |
| 18 |
visibility support. We haven't taken this decision lightly, and I believe it |
| 19 |
is the best option we have for a stable desktop. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
KDE/QT 4 should have much improved visibility support, and I will be testing |
| 22 |
them once it is workable and I have a little spare time |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 25 |
Scientific Applications | AMD64 | KDE | net-proxy |
Archives