| 1 |
On 2013.08.03 16:28, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
[snip] |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Ok all, I would like to appologise for the harsh wording. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Markos, to answer your question, there are folks on the team, and at |
| 8 |
> least one user, using OpenRc from git without issues, so as far as I |
| 9 |
> know there shouldn't be any breakage. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I guess I was a little more harsh than I should have been, because I |
| 12 |
> know there are users out here who want ~arch to be rock solid, and I |
| 13 |
> have caught flack before from some of that crowd. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> William |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
~arch is not rock solid and isn't supposed to be. I do like Williams |
| 21 |
approach to posting a warning about the upcoming change so I cam manage |
| 22 |
it for myself, if I'm feeling nervous. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Any notification of key packages changing like this is appreciated. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Regards, |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Roy Bamford |
| 30 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 31 |
elections |
| 32 |
gentoo-ops |
| 33 |
forum-mods |
| 34 |
trustees |
Archives