| 1 |
On Sat, Jun 10, 2006 at 11:37:42AM -0400, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 2 |
> Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's |
| 3 |
> release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the publication |
| 4 |
> is always "on time" (whatever that may be). If it's a bi-weekly |
| 5 |
> publication it doesn't always have to go out on the same day, as long as |
| 6 |
> you get it out in the general time period. I sometimes respond with |
| 7 |
> corrections/additions but they never make it because it is released |
| 8 |
> before my mail is sent. Often when I see the core mail I don't even |
| 9 |
> bother reading it since by looking at the timestamp I can guess it's |
| 10 |
> already been mailed. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
That's one of he things that keeps me away from contributing anything |
| 13 |
to the GWN. Whenever I've sent something to the feedback address or |
| 14 |
replied to a draft GWN with corrections, I've never heard back nor |
| 15 |
have my corrections been made or rejected with a reason. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
If the GWN wants to be that "independent" I wont stand in their |
| 18 |
way. But I do agree with Christel that the GWN today is only a shadow |
| 19 |
of what it used to be. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Regards, |
| 22 |
Brix |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> |
| 25 |
Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd |
Archives