| 1 |
>>Lack of content and poorly written or incorrect articles are often |
| 2 |
>>justified by the GWN team on grounds of overwork and insufficient |
| 3 |
>>manpower. When I asked why they were not recruiting, I was informed that |
| 4 |
>>no-one has any interest in contributing. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> There's a big difference between one-off articles and continuous |
| 7 |
> contribution. Also those that I found most willing to contribute had the |
| 8 |
> biggest language problems - what we need is support from the native |
| 9 |
> speakers. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Have the GWN posted to -core in a sane time period prior to it's |
| 14 |
release. I seriously doubt anyone cares about whether the publication |
| 15 |
is always "on time" (whatever that may be). If it's a bi-weekly |
| 16 |
publication it doesn't always have to go out on the same day, as long as |
| 17 |
you get it out in the general time period. I sometimes respond with |
| 18 |
corrections/additions but they never make it because it is released |
| 19 |
before my mail is sent. Often when I see the core mail I don't even |
| 20 |
bother reading it since by looking at the timestamp I can guess it's |
| 21 |
already been mailed. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-Alec |
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives