Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP r3] Gentoo binary package container format
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 19:17:16
Message-Id: w6g36rnd4y9.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP r3] Gentoo binary package container format by "Michał Górny"
1 >>>>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
2
3 > Specification
4 > =============
5
6 > The container format
7 > --------------------
8
9 > The gpkg package container is an uncompressed .tar achive whose filename
10 > should use ``.gpkg.tar`` suffix. This archive contains the following
11 > members, all placed in a single directory whose name matches
12 > the basename of the package file, in order:
13
14 I see no value in adding another directory indirection, and it will add
15 more overhead. Also, AFAICS the tar|tar pipeline that you previously
16 suggested won't work any more (or would at least require additional
17 arguments).
18
19 > 1. The package identifier file ``gpkg-1.txt`` (required).
20
21 > [...]
22
23 > The implementations must include a package identifier file named
24 > ``gpkg-1.txt``. The filename includes package format version;
25 > implementations should reject packages which do not contain this file
26 > as unsupported format.
27
28 > The file can have any contents. Normally, it should be empty.
29
30 If the file is empty, why is it named gpkg-1.txt (instead of just
31 gpkg-1)?
32
33 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [pre-GLEP r3] Gentoo binary package container format "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>