1 |
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 05:10:11AM +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Ok, looks like you misunderstood me. I'm not talking about beta |
4 |
> _ebuilds_. I'm talking about beta packages (like for instance, GNOME |
5 |
> produces lots of beta releases of GNOME2. These packages are _only_ |
6 |
> supposed for GNOME developers). From my discussion with Dan about this |
7 |
> issue, the KDE3 betas we are discussing here are for KDE developers. |
8 |
|
9 |
OK; if Dan is just adding KDE3 beta stuff just to have it around, it's a waste |
10 |
of time. If he needs it around to get ready for KDE3 himself, then I see some |
11 |
merit. I think Dan may just be getting a little overzealous and wanting to add |
12 |
it just because it's there. I don't anticipate that KDE3 will be particularly |
13 |
hard to build. |
14 |
|
15 |
So, I finally agree with you :) Dan, I think it's bad policy to add KDE3 beta |
16 |
ebuilds just for the sake of having them. I would only add them if we actually |
17 |
have requests from KDE developers who happen to use Gentoo Linux. But I |
18 |
imagine that any red-blooded KDE developers would be grabbing their stuff from |
19 |
CVS anyway. |
20 |
|
21 |
Best Regards, |
22 |
|
23 |
-- |
24 |
Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o> |
25 |
Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org |
26 |
Gentoo Technologies, Inc. |