Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Patrick McLean <chutzpah@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:03:55
Message-Id: 43F0D760.5060802@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:39:06 +0100 Simon Stelling <blubb@g.o>
6 > wrote:
7 > | Are you being serious about this?
8 >
9 > Sadly, even if he is, there're enough people around here that're taking
10 > that kind of thought seriously (see, for example, my sarcastic post on
11 > the 0day -core thread that so many people took as genuine)...
12 >
13 > | NOTABUG sounds good, but as Ciaran said, we need another replacement
14 > | for those bugs who really deserve it. If a user sticks
15 > | -fvisibility=hidden into his CFLAGS (instead of CXXFLAGS),
16 > | PLEASEGOAWAYKTHXBYE would be much more appropriate.
17 >
18 > They also deserve it if they stick it in their CXXFLAGS...
19 >
20
21 How about RICER or RICERFLAGS :)
22 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
23 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
24 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
25
26 iD8DBQFD8NdgWt/XSf2CZdkRAlUQAJ99NlKvRVK3zvqX+R8iZH07LvTpoACfS+sW
27 EtylhPAKUZ9qaxm6Jv3o1gk=
28 =UDkC
29 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 --
31 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions Marien Zwart <marienz@g.o>