| 1 |
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:18:53 +0000 (UTC) |
| 2 |
Martin Vaeth <martin@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Do you have any numbers on how many ebuilds were exactly being fixed? |
| 7 |
> > And how many were broken in the process because someone failed to |
| 8 |
> > update linguas_*? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Broken ebuilds are a reason to fix the ebuilds, but not a reason |
| 11 |
> to replace a working concept by a hack which only works sometimes. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If more than 95% of ebuilds are broken, this proves that a concept is |
| 14 |
broken. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Well, feel free to live in your fairy land. I have better things to do. |
| 17 |
I'm not going to continue the discussion if you are so blinded by |
| 18 |
LINGUAS that you are even unable to understand what I'm talking about, |
| 19 |
and consistently mix the LINGUAS concept and INSTALL_MASK concept, |
| 20 |
and using the resulting mish-mash to prove whatever point you consider |
| 21 |
correct. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Best regards, |
| 25 |
Michał Górny |
| 26 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives