1 |
On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 17:24 -0500, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
2 |
> Which is why there should be a maintainer flag in metadata that states |
3 |
> whether a package is maintained or not, and if so, what arches the |
4 |
> maintainer has access to for testing. |
5 |
|
6 |
I'm not sure metadata is fit, it might not apply to all ebuilds of a |
7 |
package. |
8 |
|
9 |
> Seeing as arch maintainers should generally coordinate with package |
10 |
> maintainers anyway, I don't see what the issue is here. |
11 |
|
12 |
We're not talking 'generally' here, we're talking specifically. Sure, |
13 |
the big changes get communicated about, but not every single package |
14 |
bump/bugs gets notified to all arch teams, that is overdone anyway. |
15 |
Realistically most of the time ebuilds themselves are the primary way of |
16 |
communicating changes and that is not necessarily bad. |
17 |
|
18 |
- foser |