Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jack Morgan <jmorgan@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Restructuring the ppc/ppc64 profiles to be better multilib
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 04:31:19
Message-Id: 20140730043451.GA25068@toyama.bonyari.local
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Restructuring the ppc/ppc64 profiles to be better multilib by "Anthony G. Basile"
1 On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
2 > Hi everyone,
3 >
4 > This is a ppc/ppc64 issues, but I'm sending this to gentoo-dev@ because
5 > it seems to me that those herds are pretty scattered right:
6 >
7 > 1) The issue came up about restructuring the arch/powerpc profiles.
8 > There we have some ancient stuff like ppc64/32ul. I don't know why
9 > that's needed and it doesn't make much sense wrt the new direction
10 > multilib is going. I'd like to clean up those profiles. Any objections
11 > to removing ppc64/32ul, coalescing ppc64/64ul into just ppc64 and making
12 > whatever other tweaks are needed?
13 >
14 > 2) Can we try to get the ppc/ppc64 herds communicating more. I don't
15 > believe every team needs a lead but at least have a point of reference
16 > so we can communicate.
17
18 What is the status of this? I've been away for a few months but am back
19 now. Do you need help with this?
20
21
22 Thanks,
23 --
24 Jack Morgan
25 Pub 4096R/761D8E0A 2010-09-13 Jack Morgan <jmorgan@g.o>>
26 Fingerprint = DD42 EA48 D701 D520 C2CD 55BE BF53 C69B 761D 8E0A

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Restructuring the ppc/ppc64 profiles to be better multilib "Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o>