| 1 |
Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o> writes: |
| 2 |
> > > db-4.1 is masked in the profiles |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > No: |
| 5 |
> > # grep sys-libs/db /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask |
| 6 |
> > =sys-libs/db-3.3.11 |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Not package mask, each and every profile, e.g.: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> /usr/portage/profiles/default-x86-1.4/packages |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Ok. Thanks. But now I'm a little bit confused: Until now I thought that |
| 13 |
/etc/portage/package.[un]mask had a higher priority than the files in |
| 14 |
/etc/make.profile and/or /usr/portage/profiles. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
As I see now this thougth was wrong. How do I deal with this issue |
| 17 |
without changing files which are updated every time I emerge sync? IMO |
| 18 |
it is not the right way to change files in /etc/make.profile and/or |
| 19 |
/usr/portage. Should I create a local PORTDIR_OVERLAY/profiles? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
TIA, Martin |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Better-Com bietet Support für freie Software |
| 25 |
http://www.bettercom.de - Tel.: +49-40-38037272 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives