| 1 |
On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 10:46:22AM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2006.08.03 04:27, Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 3 |
> [snip] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> >There's a good chance that a package in the regular tree will link |
| 6 |
> >against a package from sunrise, the user will have no idea or forget |
| 7 |
> >that they installed that app from sunrise (and the dep exists), and a |
| 8 |
> >bug arises. |
| 9 |
> [snip] |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> >Anyways, I've been trying to keep quiet on this issue and decided I |
| 12 |
> >could interject here :) |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> >Cheers- |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> >-- |
| 17 |
> >Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o> |
| 18 |
> >Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> >--- |
| 21 |
> >GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> |
| 22 |
> >Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> >ramereth/irc.freenode.net |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> How can that happen ? |
| 28 |
> Devs working on the regular tree should not have any third party |
| 29 |
> overlays installed in the test environment so their ebuild should fail |
| 30 |
> testing because it can't resolve the dependancy lurking in the overlay. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> What an I missing ? |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
Automatic dependencies. Eg. configure picking up fooapp being installed |
| 35 |
and enabling support for it without the ebuild explicitly |
| 36 |
enabling/disabling it. Of course, this would be a bug in the ebuild and |
| 37 |
should be fixed. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Regards, |
| 40 |
Bryan Østergaard |
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives