Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed again (was Resignation)
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 09:48:59
Message-Id: 1154598382l.9882l.1l@spike
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed again (was Resignation) by Lance Albertson
1 On 2006.08.03 04:27, Lance Albertson wrote:
2 [snip]
3
4 > There's a good chance that a package in the regular tree will link
5 > against a package from sunrise, the user will have no idea or forget
6 > that they installed that app from sunrise (and the dep exists), and a
7 > bug arises.
8 [snip]
9 >
10 > Anyways, I've been trying to keep quiet on this issue and decided I
11 > could interject here :)
12 >
13 > Cheers-
14 >
15 > --
16 > Lance Albertson <ramereth@g.o>
17 > Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager
18 >
19 > ---
20 > GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc>
21 > Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742
22 >
23 > ramereth/irc.freenode.net
24 >
25
26 How can that happen ?
27 Devs working on the regular tree should not have any third party
28 overlays installed in the test environment so their ebuild should fail
29 testing because it can't resolve the dependancy lurking in the overlay.
30
31 What an I missing ?
32
33 Regards,
34
35 Roy Bamford
36
37 --
38 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Project Sunrise resumed again (was Resignation) "Bryan Ãstergaard" <kloeri@g.o>