Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:44:14
Message-Id: 20120918224033.1fa8c1bd@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:27:17 +0100
2 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
3
4 > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:22:56 +0200
5 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
6 > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:10 +0100
7 > > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
8 > > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:06:06 +0200
9 > > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
10 > > > > So far, I'm not sure if there was a single, complete, exact
11 > > > > problem discussed which is solved by this syntax other than
12 > > > > cosmetics.
13 > > >
14 > > > Perhaps you should read the GLEP then.
15 > >
16 > > Thanks for your comprehensive answer. Could you point me, please,
17 > > where is there a real, current, exact problem described?
18 >
19 > "Motivation / Rationale"
20
21 Thanks again, I can read. Now, which one is a problem which currently
22 exists in Gentoo, is exactly described and is not a cosmetic problem?
23
24 --
25 Best regards,
26 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>