Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 04:10:57
Message-Id: CAB9SyzRSuikRer8E4mRBn3Zr9ETO67wreN+kSqqQGOk84wCVHA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal by "Michał Górny"
1 On 19 September 2012 04:40, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:27:17 +0100
3 > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
4 >
5 >> On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:22:56 +0200
6 >> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
7 >> > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:11:10 +0100
8 >> > Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote:
9 >> > > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:06:06 +0200
10 >> > > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
11 >> > > > So far, I'm not sure if there was a single, complete, exact
12 >> > > > problem discussed which is solved by this syntax other than
13 >> > > > cosmetics.
14 >> > >
15 >> > > Perhaps you should read the GLEP then.
16 >> >
17 >> > Thanks for your comprehensive answer. Could you point me, please,
18 >> > where is there a real, current, exact problem described?
19 >>
20 >> "Motivation / Rationale"
21 >
22 > Thanks again, I can read. Now, which one is a problem which currently
23 > exists in Gentoo, is exactly described and is not a cosmetic problem?
24
25 There isn't one in the current GLEP.
26
27 --
28 Cheers,
29
30 Ben | yngwin
31 Gentoo developer
32 Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin