| 1 |
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 05:50:11 +0100 |
| 2 |
Marius Mauch <genone@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > You pretty much have to have a way of mapping an EAPI version onto |
| 4 |
> > an absolute version if you want to handle it sanely. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Right, and that's likely to cause a mess in the long run IMO. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Eh, it's already necessary if package managers want to support things |
| 9 |
like CPAN natively. It's not too big a deal. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > Mmm, no. You have some concept of a superset of all supported naming |
| 12 |
> > rules, then refine once you've extracted the EAPI. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Assuming the current package manager supports all used EAPIs, |
| 15 |
> otherwise a formerly invalid name could still break it. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
'Twould just have to ignore them. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives