Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives!
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 11:13:18
Message-Id: pan.2007.11.16.11.10.09@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: packages.gentoo.org lives! by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o> posted
2 20071115233150.GL18361@××××××××××××××××××××××××.net, excerpted below, on
3 Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:31:50 -0800:
4
5 > My usability design range in testing this spans: 1024x768 to 1680x1050,
6 > at both 72dpi and 100dpi. However it seems that I didn't take into
7 > account fonts that render extremely small :-(.
8
9 Even 100 DPI is a bit coarse. Modern CRTs seem to standardize at 120 DPI
10 or so, or at least that's what I've seen (21-22", 1600x1200 recommended
11 resolution, matching shadow-mask), tho I guess LCDs are only 100 DPI or
12 so high end (I just looked up the 30" 2560x1600 Apple Cinemas I've been
13 wanting, but that are still out of my price range, 3-4 grand US for a
14 pair).
15
16 @ that 120 DPI, minimum operational font-point is 8-9 pt or so, here. I
17 have elements of my GUI set to 8 pt, tho I prefer 11 pt for comfortable
18 web viewing. I'd certainly not call 10 pt extremely small -- that's 6-7
19 pt! =8^)
20
21 And yes, as I said, I have the issue with the logo overrunning the text
22 here too. =8^(
23
24 --
25 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
26 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
27 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
28
29 --
30 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list