Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
To: Tom Syroid <tom@×××××××××××.com>, Matt Beland <matt@××××××××××××××.org>, gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released?
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 07:14:11
Message-Id: 006b01c27a8d$b1829e20$8204dca7@northamerica.corp.microsoft.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released? by Tom Syroid
1 You miss the fact that MANY new ports have not been added to the tree, but
2 have been marked as LATER instead. Marked out right and not even reviewed.
3
4 OH -- for you chess players out there, I have created a port for SCID that
5 is waiting in the queue -- and I created it for the stable 3.3 version, not
6 the beta (coming soon). http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9391
7
8 Tom Veldhouse
9
10 ----- Original Message -----
11 From: "Tom Syroid" <tom@×××××××××××.com>
12 To: "Matt Beland" <matt@××××××××××××××.org>; <gentoo-dev@g.o>
13 Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 2:43 PM
14 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: When is Gentoo 1.4 going to be released?
15
16
17 > Hi Matt ;-) long time, no chat.
18 >
19 > --On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:15:49 -0700 Matt Beland
20 > <matt@××××××××××××××.org> wrote:
21 >
22 > > We want the Gentoo team to let us know when they're going to
23 > > let us take full advantage of the portage system again. Frankly, I (and
24 > > I suspect most others) could care less about the 1.4 release in and of
25 > > itself. Sure, a new version of the compiler and so on would be nice, but
26 > > I can get that on my own if necessary. The problem is that the portage
27 > > tree is frozen waiting for 1.4, and has been for some time.
28 >
29 > Without trying to be contentious here (in other words, simple honest
30 > question)...
31 >
32 > I know you well enough that I can safely say you're not about to go off
33 > using a new version of something on any kind of critcal box without
34 testing
35 > it first. So on the assumption that you have already discerned
36 > program/tool/system utility is "ready for prime time", what's wrong with
37 > simply edited the "frozen" entry in package.mask and installing it?
38 >
39 > While I concur that the Gentoo development team as a whole could do a
40 > better job of communicating TODO's and loose timelines to the community, I
41 > don't see how a frozen Portage tree is preventing you from utilizing the
42 > distribution in any way you heart desires.
43 >
44 > Best,
45 > /tom
46 >
47 >
48 > _______________________________________________
49 > gentoo-dev mailing list
50 > gentoo-dev@g.o
51 > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
52 >