1 |
Hi Marek,
|
2 |
|
3 |
Marek Szuba <marecki@g.o> writes:
|
4 |
|
5 |
> On 2019-06-27 04:16, Benda Xu wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
>> Michał, you were overreacting to the word "GSoC" since our original RFC |
8 |
>> at gentoo-dev. Please, just ignore GSoC when you are executing your |
9 |
>> experise of QA. Gentoo should be developed independently, regardless of |
10 |
>> whether any development effort is supported by 3rd party. |
11 |
> [...] |
12 |
>> Personally I don't regard the GSoC selection and decision process |
13 |
>> interesting to all the Gentoo devs. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> In my opinion Michał has got a very good point regarding potential PR |
16 |
> consequences of us rejecting GSoC work. |
17 |
|
18 |
I agree with you.
|
19 |
|
20 |
> Of course it can be done, I've seen my share of student projects of |
21 |
> various sort getting binned immediately after implementation - but |
22 |
> more often than not it shows a lack of of foresight, at best, on |
23 |
> behalf of institutions which requested manpower for such projects. |
24 |
|
25 |
Agreed, too. It is the mentor's duty to facilitate a win-win outcome to
|
26 |
our student, Gentoo and Google, by being more careful on visions and
|
27 |
planning.
|
28 |
|
29 |
> Yes, it is good for you to have eventually brought this to -dev - but |
30 |
> IMHO it really is too late. In the future, I would STRONGLY advise |
31 |
> having a general discussion before having even a single line of code |
32 |
> written. |
33 |
|
34 |
In retrospect, I was overconfident about my technical judgement. I will
|
35 |
take your advice. Thank you, Marek.
|
36 |
|
37 |
Yours,
|
38 |
Benda |