| 1 |
Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Shouldn't this process work a lot better? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Processes tend to work better when people are contributing towards |
| 5 |
> making the processes work better rather than complaining from their |
| 6 |
> comfy armchairs that they tend to confuse with thrones. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
LOL! |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Are you honestly arguing that the Gentoo lastriting process relies on |
| 11 |
third party contributions to work or improve? That would amount to |
| 12 |
declaring Gentoo (developers) incapable of self-improvement, something |
| 13 |
that would be absolutely unacceptable to say about any one or any group |
| 14 |
of people. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
If you feel that Gentoo is unsustainable like that then please think |
| 17 |
about how you should react to it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Instead of writing a passive aggressive response to my demonstration |
| 21 |
of this process failure I wish that you would have drawn on your |
| 22 |
knowledge of the process and the learnings in my mail to 1. educate |
| 23 |
us on what gaps you see, if any, that caused this particular error, |
| 24 |
and maybe even 2. suggest some improvements. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Expecting and/or demanding that from me because I dared describe a |
| 27 |
symptom and question the process is neither reasonable nor fair nor |
| 28 |
useful. Shooting the messenger reveals that you can't deal with the |
| 29 |
message, but that's a you problem, it's not okay to project that onto |
| 30 |
the messenger or anyone else. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
If you wanted to encourage me to become a Gentoo developer and (among |
| 34 |
other things) improve the lastriting process then you missed the mark, |
| 35 |
in fact your behavior consistently remains one strong reason for me |
| 36 |
to *not* become a Gentoo developer. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Kind regards |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
//Peter |
Archives