Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The deal with epkgmove | ||
| Date: | Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:33:57 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20051210172909.3a440754@snowdrop.home | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] The deal with epkgmove by Luca Barbato |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:56:55 +0100 Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |
| 2 | wrote: |
| 3 | | I'd suggest having a look at git or mercurial, they are tested on a |
| 4 | | quite big workload and they seems good enough for the task. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Workload isn't the issue. It's number of files. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) |
| 10 | Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 11 | Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] The deal with epkgmove | "Fernando J. Pereda" <ferdy@g.o> |