Archives
Archives
| From: | Thilo Bangert <bangert@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild | ||
| Date: | Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:20:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201011121319.13016.bangert@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild by Peter Volkov |
||
| 1 | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> said: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > Beta is beta. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | If this argument was so strong as you seem to imply, then perhaps the |
| 6 | package manager could be made to enforce it. (to me the world less black |
| 7 | and white, though.) |
| 8 | |
| 9 | apart from that, the package.mask file is still an abomination and we |
| 10 | should really come up with better ways to mask packages. i think somebody |
| 11 | once suggested to split KEYWORDS from the ebuild - making it more |
| 12 | elaborate and separating the signing of the ebuild and its stability |
| 13 | status in the process. any takers? |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |