Archives
Archives
| From: | "Rémi Cardona" <remi@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:19:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 49A7A1EA.3090002@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Should that file be a License ? by Jeremy Olexa |
||
| 1 | Le 27/02/2009 06:32, Jeremy Olexa a écrit : |
| 2 | > bump. Can anyone help out here? Is it a license or a doc? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | I would say it is in fact a license, but since all it seems to do is to |
| 5 | confirm that whatever GnuGk does under the GPLv2 is allowed, I wouldn't |
| 6 | necessarily put it in the license dir. But do include it in the doc dir. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Nota Bene: IANAL |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Cheers, |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Rémi |