| 1 |
Mounir Lamouri wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) |
| 3 |
> <hkBst@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 5 |
>> Hash: SHA1 |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Mounir Lamouri wrote: |
| 8 |
>>> Hi, |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug |
| 11 |
>>> #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see |
| 12 |
>>> http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project |
| 13 |
>>> (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under |
| 14 |
>>> GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as |
| 15 |
>>> another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case, |
| 16 |
>>> should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be |
| 17 |
>>> "templatized" like most licenses ? |
| 18 |
>>> |
| 19 |
>>> Thanks, |
| 20 |
>>> Mounir |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>> That paste is gone/expired. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> I attached it to this email. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Mounir |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
bump. Can anyone help out here? Is it a license or a doc? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~darkside/tmp/p2pnat_license.txt |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
thx. |
Archives