| 1 |
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) |
| 2 |
<hkBst@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 4 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Mounir Lamouri wrote: |
| 7 |
>> Hi, |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug |
| 10 |
>> #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see |
| 11 |
>> http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project |
| 12 |
>> (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under |
| 13 |
>> GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as |
| 14 |
>> another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case, |
| 15 |
>> should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be |
| 16 |
>> "templatized" like most licenses ? |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> Thanks, |
| 19 |
>> Mounir |
| 20 |
>> |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> That paste is gone/expired. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Marijn |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> - -- |
| 27 |
> Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML |
| 30 |
> <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode |
| 31 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 32 |
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) |
| 33 |
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> iEYEARECAAYFAkmixHYACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wURgCff8WSLE9PHXfO/HI+GdrE1W3J |
| 36 |
> 0/kAoLpB4oFEwOx5Dk+ceo70vCueZgbk |
| 37 |
> =hKRC |
| 38 |
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 39 |
> |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
I attached it to this email. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
Mounir |
Archives