| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Mounir Lamouri wrote: |
| 5 |
> Hi, |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug |
| 8 |
> #258518) but upstream added a file named p2pnat_license.txt (see |
| 9 |
> http://dpaste.com/123376/) This file looks to authorize gnugk project |
| 10 |
> (and users) to use p2pnat technology. gnugk is already licensed under |
| 11 |
> GPL-2 and I was wondering if this new file should be considered as |
| 12 |
> another license and if it has to be in the LICENSE line ? In this case, |
| 13 |
> should the file be added like he is in the gnugk tarball or should it be |
| 14 |
> "templatized" like most licenses ? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Thanks, |
| 17 |
> Mounir |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That paste is gone/expired. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Marijn |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
- -- |
| 25 |
Sarcasm puts the iron in irony, cynicism the steel. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project, Gentoo ML |
| 28 |
<http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-{lisp,ml} on FreeNode |
| 29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) |
| 31 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkmixHYACgkQp/VmCx0OL2wURgCff8WSLE9PHXfO/HI+GdrE1W3J |
| 34 |
0/kAoLpB4oFEwOx5Dk+ceo70vCueZgbk |
| 35 |
=hKRC |
| 36 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives