Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain

[Danny van Dyk]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Corey Shields schrieb:
| On Friday 18 November 2005 08:31 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
|
|>No, thats not entirely true. It was submitted a few months ago and >>taken
|>to the council where it was rejected and asked to be revised. When the
|>council asked for things to put on their agenda for this latest >>meeting,
|>it was asked that this GLEP be voted upon again. At this point, the
|>revised version had yet to be shown on -dev for discussion. It wasn't
|>until a day before the vote that it was sent to -dev for discussion.
|>
|>I just wanted to get the facts straight :-) (at least from how I >>know).
|
|
| Ahh, ok   thanks for clearing that up.
|
| Still screwed up.  Lesson learned, make friends with a majority of the
| council, write and propose a glep the day before a meeting and then
| push it
| through.  wow.  sounds a lot like American politics.
Oh please Corey... Now you sound like a pissed kid.

Please have a look at the council's meeting log. They said:
a) the changes had been minor and exactly what the changes they wanted
in in the first meeting.
b) they stated that this is the first and the last time that a GLEP will
be voted on if that hasn't been discussed sufficiently long enough on -dev
c) that new limitations for a vote are: send (revised) glep to
gentoo-dev (at least) 14 days before the next council meeting, ask (at
least) 7 days before the meeting for vote. (For this you can also read
seemants mail announcing the availability of the logs)

Danny
- --
Danny van Dyk <kugelfang@g.o>
Gentoo/AMD64 Project, Gentoo Scientific Project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDf5OjaVNL8NrtU6IRAhzLAJ9Bi1xUcRj7kKE2MWaP8NbceOxuqACcDOy3
t+G1qlkXwKytmLz4Lt/Rox8=
=PeVH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list